What should be the long range (50 year) land use concept for North Cooper Mountain?

Key considerations:

• Largely developed
• Little remaining buildable land
• Private development restrictions on some property
• Area is inside the urban growth boundary

	Little or no support	Some or moderate support	Strong support
Low density residential - continue existing land use pattern
Low-Moderate density residential - infill and redevelopment at 6 homes/net acre
Moderate density residential - infill and redevelopment at 10 homes/net acre

Other comments on this area?

---

Done

What should be the long range (50 year) land use concept for The Creeks area?

This question applies only to the small areas of buildable land outside of the Nature Park.

Key considerations:

• Includes Cooper Mtn Nature Park & surrounding wooded stream system
• Important natural resources & habitat corridors
• "Pockets" of buildable land
• Area is designated urban reserve

	Little or no support	Some or moderate support	Strong support
Natural resource area – preservation and open space
Clustered housing – limited single-family housing with habitat-friendly design

Other comments on this area?

---

Done

What should be the long range (50 year) land use concept for the Hilltop area?

• Relatively gentle grades
• Largely buildable
• Adjacent to existing residential development
• Views
• Area is designated urban reserve

	Little or no support	Some or moderate support	Strong support
Mixed Use Node - focal point for surrounding community; variety of housing types; small retail
New neighborhood A – variety of housing types; average density of 15 homes/net acre
New neighborhood B – emphasize detached homes; average density of 10 homes/net acre

Other comments on this area?

---

Done

What should be the long range (50 year) land use concept for Grabhorn Meadow?

Key considerations:

• Gently sloping
• Largely buildable
• Adjacent to rural reserve / agricultural area
• Close to SCMAA/Lowlands (but separated by a stream crossing)
• The Neighborhood A and B concepts below reflect regional requirements
• Area is designated urban reserve

	Little or no support	Some or moderate support	Strong support
New neighborhood A – variety of housing types; average density of 15 homes/net acre
New neighborhood B – emphasize detached homes; average density of 10 homes/net acre

Other comments on this area?

---

Done

What are your comments on the proposed land use concept for this area – i.e. a complete and sustainable community?

Key considerations:

• Area is mostly within the urban growth boundary and city limits
• The portion of the area designated urban reserve is generally buildable
• Regional requirements for a complete community apply
• Beaverton has flexibility in how it applies regional requirements and plans this community

	Little or no support	Some or moderate support	Strong support
Complete and sustainable community – 13-15 homes/acre average across the area

Other comments on this area?

---

Done

What should be the long range (50 year) land use concept for the East Hills area?

Key considerations:

• Partially developed
• Some natural resource & slope constraints
• Adjacent but not connected to existing residential development
• Actual infill will vary with site-specific conditions
• Area is designated urban reserve

	Little or no support	Some or moderate support	Strong support
Low-Moderate density hillside neighborhood - infill and new development at 2 to 8 homes/net acre
Moderate density hillside neighborhood- infill and new development at 4 to 12 homes/net acre

Other comments on this area?

---

Done